Implications of Supreme Court’s Ruling on National Lottery Act Across 36 States
The Supreme Court of Nigeria has nullified the enforcement of the National Lottery Act across all 36 states of the country.
The ruling declared that the federal government did not have the constitutional authority to enforce the act in the states, as it pertains to an area under the jurisdiction of state governments.
The National Lottery Act, which was originally designed to regulate and oversee the operation of lottery activities across Nigeria, had been enforced by the federal government.
However, the Supreme Court ruled that lottery and gaming activities fall within the purview of state governments, meaning each state has the right to regulate or prohibit such activities as it sees fit.
This landmark ruling has significant implications for the lottery industry in Nigeria, particularly in terms of the operation of state lotteries.
States now have more autonomy over the regulation of their own lottery systems, and they can choose whether or not to enforce the provisions of the National Lottery Act within their borders.
The decision is also expected to lead to changes in the structure of lottery operations in Nigeria, potentially allowing states to create their own frameworks for regulating or managing lottery activities without federal interference.
The ruling has sparked mixed reactions, with some supporting the increased state autonomy, while others express concerns about the potential fragmentation of the industry.