Hunter Biden Says His Pardon Was “Not Good” for America or Joe Biden’s Legacy
Hunter Biden has acknowledged that the presidential pardon granted to him by his father, former President Joe Biden, was “not good” for America or for his father’s legacy, offering a striking assessment of one of the most controversial decisions of the Biden presidency.
In an interview with the BBC, Hunter Biden reflected on the pardon and the political fallout that followed. His comments come after years of intense public scrutiny surrounding his personal life, business dealings and federal criminal cases, as well as the decision by his father to intervene before leaving the White House.
Joe Biden issued a full and unconditional pardon for his son in December 2024. The pardon covered federal offenses Hunter Biden had committed or may have committed during a specified period dating back to 2014. The decision came after Hunter had been convicted in a federal gun case and pleaded guilty to federal tax charges.
At the time, Joe Biden had repeatedly said that he would not pardon his son. The reversal therefore generated significant criticism from Republicans and some Democrats, who argued that the decision undermined the former president’s previous statements about restoring confidence in the justice system.
Hunter Biden has now offered a candid assessment of the controversy, acknowledging that the pardon created political difficulties for his father.
Speaking to the BBC, Hunter reportedly said that he did not believe the pardon was beneficial to the United States or to his father’s historical legacy. At the same time, he defended his father’s decision as an act of love by a parent who believed his son had been unfairly targeted.
The comments highlight the complicated relationship between personal loyalty and presidential responsibility. Joe Biden had faced years of political attacks related to his son’s conduct, and the criminal cases against Hunter became a recurring issue during the 2024 presidential campaign.
Hunter’s federal prosecution had already become a major political flashpoint. He was convicted by a Delaware jury in June 2024 on three felony charges related to his purchase of a handgun while allegedly being an unlawful user of controlled substances. He later pleaded guilty to federal tax offenses in California.
Under normal circumstances, Hunter Biden faced the possibility of significant punishment. The pardon removed that federal criminal exposure and prevented him from being sentenced in the cases.
Joe Biden defended his decision at the time by saying he believed Hunter had been selectively and unfairly prosecuted. The former president argued that similar circumstances had been treated differently in other cases and said he could not stand by while his son faced what he considered politically motivated treatment.
Critics strongly disagreed.
Republicans accused Biden of using presidential power to protect a family member from legitimate criminal consequences. President Donald Trump, who returned to the White House in January 2025, criticized the pardon and described it as an abuse of the pardon power.
The controversy also drew attention because Biden’s administration had frequently emphasized the independence of the Justice Department. Critics argued that pardoning his son created the appearance of a double standard, even though presidents possess broad constitutional authority to issue federal pardons.
Hunter Biden’s latest comments appear to recognize the political consequences of that decision. By saying the pardon was not good for America or his father’s legacy, he acknowledged that the move created a lasting controversy that could influence how Joe Biden’s presidency is remembered.
Nevertheless, Hunter has continued to defend his father personally. He has repeatedly argued that Joe Biden was motivated by concern for his son’s safety and future rather than an attempt to undermine the justice system.
The pardon also remains an important part of the broader debate over presidential clemency in the United States. Presidents from both political parties have used their pardon powers to benefit controversial figures, political allies, family members and people convicted of serious offenses.
Hunter Biden’s case became particularly prominent because of his relationship to a sitting president and the political significance of the underlying criminal investigations.
His public reflections suggest that he understands the difficult position his father faced. While the pardon protected him from federal prosecution and potential imprisonment, it also created another chapter of controversy for Joe Biden at the end of his presidency.
For Hunter, the personal consequences of the cases extended well beyond the courtroom. The scrutiny affected his family, reputation and relationship with his father, while his legal problems became a central political weapon for opponents of the Biden administration.
The BBC interview provides another glimpse into how Hunter Biden views those events after leaving the immediate pressure of the criminal proceedings behind. His admission that the pardon was not good for America or his father’s legacy represents a notable departure from simply defending the decision.
The statement is unlikely to end the political debate surrounding the pardon. Supporters of Joe Biden will continue to point to what they regard as unfair treatment of Hunter, while critics will argue that the decision demonstrated the dangers of presidents using their constitutional powers for relatives.
Ultimately, Hunter Biden’s assessment adds a personal dimension to a controversy that has already become part of the historical record of Joe Biden’s presidency. The pardon may have protected Hunter from further federal punishment, but, by his own admission, it came at a significant political cost to his father and raised difficult questions about presidential power, fairness and the legacy of the Biden administration.
About the Author
