Unseen King Von Murder Footage Shown in Lil Durk Trial as Prosecutors Revisit Rapper’s Death
Unseen surveillance footage from the 2020 killing of King Von was shown in court during Lil Durk’s federal murder-for-hire trial, bringing renewed attention to the death of the Chicago rapper and the events that prosecutors say ultimately motivated an alleged revenge plot.
The footage was presented as prosecutors continued building their case against Lil Durk, whose legal name is Durk Devontay Banks. The Grammy-winning rapper is accused of orchestrating a 2022 attempt to kill Quando Rondo in Los Angeles as retaliation for the death of his close friend and fellow OTF artist King Von.
Durk has pleaded not guilty and has denied the allegations.
King Von, whose real name was Dayvon Bennett, was fatally shot on November 6, 2020, outside a hookah lounge in Atlanta following an altercation involving members of his group and Quando Rondo’s circle. The shooting became one of the most significant tragedies in modern hip-hop and remained a major part of the relationship between the artists involved.
During the current trial, prosecutors have sought to establish that Von’s death was a major factor behind the alleged plot against Rondo.
According to prosecutors, Durk became consumed with seeking revenge after Von’s killing. They allege that two years later, members of Durk’s Only the Family, or OTF, circle traveled from Chicago to Los Angeles and targeted Rondo.
The alleged attack took place near the Beverly Center in August 2022. Rondo survived, but his cousin, Saviay’a “Lul Pab” Robinson, was fatally shot. Prosecutors have described the case as one involving revenge, stalking and a premeditated murder-for-hire scheme.
The newly shown footage of Von’s death reportedly provided jurors with a more extensive view of the confrontation than material that had previously circulated publicly.
According to reports from the courtroom, the surveillance recording showed the altercation involving Von, Quando Rondo and others before gunfire erupted. The footage was presented as part of the prosecution’s effort to give jurors additional context surrounding the event that allegedly preceded the later Los Angeles shooting.
The graphic nature of evidence connected to both shootings has made the trial particularly difficult to watch.
Reports indicate that jurors have been exposed to surveillance footage, photographs and other evidence concerning the deaths. Prosecutors have also presented digital records, including text messages and location information, as they attempt to connect the alleged retaliation to Durk.
One set of messages presented during the proceedings reportedly included Durk discussing the effect of Von’s death on him. Prosecutors have used such communications to argue that the rapper was deeply motivated by revenge.
The defense, however, has strongly challenged that interpretation.
Durk’s attorneys have argued that prosecutors are attempting to turn emotional reactions to the death of a close friend into evidence of criminal intent. They have maintained that Durk was not involved in the Los Angeles shooting and was not present when Robinson was killed.
Defense attorney Marissa Goldberg has pointed toward Durk’s former personal assistant, Kavon “OTF Vonni” Grant, as the person who allegedly organized important elements of the operation. Grant has pleaded guilty and is cooperating with prosecutors. The defense has suggested that Grant had his own reasons for shifting blame toward Durk.
The prosecution’s case includes several cooperating witnesses.
Among them is Kacey “OTF Jam” Hester, who has testified about the alleged plot. Prosecutors have also identified other cooperating witnesses who are expected to provide evidence about communications and events surrounding the alleged attempt to kill Rondo.
The trial has also placed considerable attention on music and lyrics.
Federal prosecutors have been permitted to introduce certain songs and music videos by Durk, including “Pissed Me Off,” arguing that the material can help establish motive and his alleged desire for retaliation following Von’s death.
Durk’s defense has disputed that interpretation, arguing that rap lyrics are artistic expression and should not automatically be treated as literal descriptions of criminal conduct. The judge ultimately ruled that the “Pissed Me Off” video could be used as evidence, while allowing the defense to challenge the government’s interpretation.
The prosecution has attempted to show jurors a chain of events beginning with Von’s death and eventually leading to the Los Angeles shooting.
That narrative is central to the government’s case.
Prosecutors allege that Durk wanted revenge against Quando Rondo because of the circumstances surrounding Von’s death. They contend that money, communications and instructions were used to facilitate an attempted killing.
The defense insists that the government has not established that connection beyond a reasonable doubt.
The distinction is important because Durk is not on trial for King Von’s death. Rather, prosecutors are using the circumstances surrounding Von’s killing as part of their explanation for why they believe Durk allegedly wanted Rondo killed.
The man accused of fatally shooting King Von was Lul Timm, whose real name is Timothy Leeks. The murder charge against Leeks was ultimately dropped in 2023 after prosecutors said there was insufficient evidence to proceed.
Von’s death nevertheless remained deeply influential in the hip-hop community.
His death affected his family, OTF associates and fans around the world, while the rivalry between people connected to Von and Rondo continued to generate attention.
For Durk, prosecutors argue that the emotional aftermath eventually became a motive for criminal retaliation.
His lawyers see the situation differently.
They have portrayed Durk as a successful artist who became the target of prosecutors’ efforts to connect his music, friendships and personal grief to a crime he did not commit. They argue that other individuals involved in the alleged operation had stronger direct connections to the planning and execution of the shooting.
As the trial continues, jurors are being asked to evaluate a large amount of evidence, including surveillance videos, phone records, text messages, witness testimony, music and other digital material.
The King Von murder footage is therefore only one component of a much larger prosecution case.
The trial is expected to continue with testimony from additional witnesses as both sides present their competing accounts of what happened.
For hip-hop fans, the proceedings have also reopened painful memories of King Von’s death and its lasting consequences.
Von was only 26 when he was killed, and his death ended the career of one of Chicago’s most prominent young rappers at a time when his popularity was rapidly increasing.
Now, nearly six years after his death, footage from that night is being examined again in a federal courtroom as part of a separate criminal case.
The presentation of the footage does not establish guilt against Lil Durk. The rapper remains presumed innocent unless prosecutors prove their allegations beyond a reasonable doubt.
What the evidence ultimately means will be determined by the jury.
For now, the King Von murder footage has become another significant piece of evidence in one of the most closely watched federal cases involving a major hip-hop artist, while prosecutors and defense attorneys continue to disagree sharply over the events that followed Von’s death.
About the Author
