Diddy’s Defense: ‘Freak Offs’ Were Consensual, Not Coercive

Diddy Case: Defense Claims Consensual ‘Freak Offs’

​Sean “Diddy” Combs is currently facing federal charges, including sex trafficking and racketeering. Central to these allegations are events referred to as “freak offs,” which prosecutors describe as elaborate, drug-fueled sex parties involving coercion and non-consensual acts.

Diddy’s defense team asserts that these encounters were entirely consensual. They argue that the “freak offs” were private activities between consenting adults and challenge the prosecution to provide evidence of coercion.

In a court filing, Diddy’s attorneys contend that the prosecution’s portrayal of these events is “sexist and puritanical,” suggesting it undermines the agency of the participants involved. They maintain that the activities depicted in the videos were consensual and lacked any form of coercion or violence. ​

The defense has requested access to the videos cited by the prosecution, asserting that these recordings will substantiate their claims of consensual interactions. They emphasize the importance of analyzing the footage to challenge the allegations effectively.

As the trial approaches, the court will need to assess the evidence presented by both sides to determine the validity of the claims regarding consent and coercion in these incidents.​