DSS Witness Links Sowore’s Post on Tinubu to Rising Public Tension in Ongoing Defamation Case
A witness from the Department of State Services (DSS) has told a Federal High Court that a social media post made by activist and publisher Omoyele Sowore about President Bola Ahmed Tinubu contributed to rising public tension across parts of the country. The testimony was presented as part of ongoing proceedings in the alleged defamation case filed against Sowore.
According to the witness, Sowore’s online statements—widely circulated across major social media platforms—sparked intense reactions from political supporters, critics, and the wider public, which the witness claimed had the potential to disrupt public order. He argued that the post “carried sensitive undertones” and was capable of inflaming an already polarized political climate.
The DSS maintained that Sowore’s comments went beyond conventional political criticism and qualified as a deliberate attempt to undermine the credibility of the presidency. The witness further stated that intelligence reports gathered after the publication showed a spike in politically charged conversations, which security agencies interpreted as early indicators of possible unrest.
Sowore, however, has consistently denied any wrongdoing, insisting that his statements fall within the constitutional right to free speech and public scrutiny of elected leaders. His legal team argued that the prosecution was attempting to criminalize dissent and silence a journalist known for holding powerful figures accountable.
During the court session, Sowore appeared composed as his lawyers challenged the credibility of the DSS testimony. They questioned the methodology used to assess “public tension,” arguing that criticism of government officials is a normal feature of democratic societies.
Human rights observers have been closely following the case, describing it as another test of Nigeria’s commitment to press freedom and freedom of expression. Several civil society groups have warned that aggressive prosecution of journalists could discourage public participation in governance and erode democratic norms.
The judge has adjourned the case to allow both parties to present additional arguments. Meanwhile, Sowore reaffirmed that he would not be intimidated, reiterating that Nigerians have the right to question and criticize their leaders.
As the trial continues, the matter is expected to spark further debate over the boundaries between free speech, defamation, and national security, especially at a time when political tensions remain high across the country.
About the Author
