Cubana Chiefpriest Slams Isaac Fayose After Video on Igbos Aligning with Government
Popular Nigerian socialite and businessman, Cubana Chiefpriest, has publicly criticized Isaac Fayose following a video in which Fayose condemned Igbos allegedly aligning with the government of the day.
The controversy began after Isaac Fayose, a political commentator and public figure, shared a video expressing his views about the political stance of some members of the Igbo community. In the video, Fayose reportedly questioned and criticized what he described as support or alignment with the current administration.
The remarks sparked reactions across social media, with users divided over the commentary. While some agreed with Fayose’s perspective, others described his comments as divisive and unnecessary.
Reacting strongly, Cubana Chiefpriest took to his social media page to fire back at Fayose. In a heated response, the nightlife entrepreneur described Fayose as “very useless and jealous,” further claiming that Fayose’s “entire net worth is in my wardrobe.” The statement quickly gained traction online, fueling further debate.
Cubana Chiefpriest, known for his outspoken personality and frequent commentary on social and political issues, did not hold back in defending what he appeared to see as an unfair generalization of the Igbo community. Though he did not provide detailed political arguments, his response suggested dissatisfaction with Fayose’s remarks.
The exchange has since generated significant engagement on various platforms, with supporters of both men weighing in. Some social media users urged public figures to avoid comments that could inflame ethnic or political tensions, while others defended the right to free speech and political expression.
Neither Isaac Fayose nor Cubana Chiefpriest has indicated any intention to escalate the matter beyond social media exchanges. However, the clash highlights the increasing intersection of celebrity influence and political discourse in Nigeria.
As discussions continue online, observers note that such public disagreements often reflect broader conversations about ethnicity, political alignment, and national unity. For now, the situation remains a war of words, with both figures maintaining their respective positions.
Further reactions are expected as the debate continues to trend across digital platforms.
About the Author
